Brought to you by
Brought to you by
Welcome to the Primary Energy Renewable (PER) landing page. Here you will be able to find an introduction to the topic of PER and further articles that explain the various aspects of this subject area.
Common methodologies for the energy efficiency assessment of buildings are:
Presently our main concern is the reduction of greenhouse gasses, GWP (which PE is related to), and the transition to a non-fossil-based energy supply, which will take place over several decades. Buildings constructed today will have longer life cycles than just the transition phase to a non-fossil based society and hence they will also be used in the post-transition era. During the transition phase, PE and GWP factors are changing, and will finally approach zero as we reach a society powered by 100% renewable energy. Does this mean, buildings, regardless of their construction, become better and better and their (final) energy use doesn’t matter?
The above-mentioned assessment methods suggest this, but obviously, this is not the case. Renewable energy must be generated, delivered, and often stored. Renewable energy needs infrastructure and space which will become a decisive limiting factor. We want affordable renewable energy for all, and for all applications. For these reasons, energy use must be efficient: energy efficiency is the prerequisite for effective renewable energy supply. Bearing in mind that a third of the total energy consumed in developed countries is required for operating buildings, we realise how important this sector is for the transition, and obviously the traditional assessment methods are not adequate for this future scenario.
When our society’s energy supply becomes 100% renewable, we will need guidance on how to design and construct buildings to become an integral part of our renewable future. With the new PER system, an assessment method has been developed which allows the optimisation of buildings with respect to their performance in a system with 100 % of their energy derived from renewable resources. In such a supply system, buildings will play a major role not only by reducing their energy need, but also by providing space and structure for renewable energy generation assets.
Zero, Net Zero, Nearly Zero, Plus: these assessment systems already account for renewables generated on site (or nearby). Here final energy needs or uses are balanced with energy production. But energy demand and renewable energy supply are not synchronized. Therefore, energy must be stored until it is needed, and of course, this requires additional energy which must be considered. Seasonal disparities in energy production and consumption are particularly problematic: Net zero buildings typically require most energy in winter, which must be generated in summer and stored for the winter. This does not only require extra energy, but it is also very expensive since the storage can only be used once a year. Therefore, it is advisable to build more efficient buildings, especially to reduce energy demand in seasons where there is insufficient renewable energy available to address the demand.
Renewable primary energy (PER) is the unit of energy generated from renewable resources, e.g. electricity produced by a photovoltaic system / wind turbine or heat generated with a solar thermal system. PER-factors reflect the primary renewable resources needed to cover the final energy demand of a building, including distribution and storage losses. In the case of a PER-factor of 1.5, a surplus of 50% renewable primary energy is needed to be able to meet the final energy demand at the building. The higher the PER-factor, the higher the required resources and therefore the more important the implementation of efficiency measures in order to avoid compensation from non-renewable sources.
With the PER system, the energy transition to 100 % primary energy supply from renewable resources is anticipated. The new assessment methodology does not promote the simple annual offset of on-site energy demand and energy production in the context of individual buildings. The achieved level of energy efficiency and renewable energy supply need to be assessed independently of one another. Direct offsetting disregards important aspects, such as energy losses due to storage and space availability for renewable energy production.
Within the PER system, the energy demand of buildings is analysed in an environment of a solely renewable energy supply network. Depending on the type of energy application, as well as on the locally available renewable energy resources, the amount of required storage varies, and thus the associated losses. Based on these interrelationships, weighting factors, the so-called PER factors are derived and used as indicator as to which energy applications are the most resource intensive. In this way, PER factors depend only on the location of the building, the application (e.g. heating, cooling or specific electricity), and the final energy carrier. They do not depend on the actual supply system. They are local physical parameters, such as climate data. In practice, they are automatically provided with the PHPP, in the same way the climate data sets are.
For both energy demand and, if applicable, generation at the building site, the Primary energy renewable is calculated. For the assessment, these have different reference values.
The primary energy renewable demand is measured against the value of the service, which is represented by the useful space of the building, the so-called “Treated floor area (TFA)”.
The primary energy renewable generation is measured against the limited resources which the building possesses, which is the area it occupies, so that it is no longer available for other uses. We call it the “Projected building footprint (PBF)”.
Therefore, the specific PER values for demand and generation cannot be balanced directly and remain as two distinct dimensions of the assessment.
The PER assessment methodology is the basis for the definition of the Passive House Classes. They classify the building in terms of their overall efficiency level and the renewable energy production into three distinct categories: Passive House Classic, Plus and Premium.
It is essential to note that the functional definition of the Passive House standard remains unchanged and is the same for all three Passive House classes (relating to useful energy demand for heating and cooling, as well as airtightness and comfort criteria). For the three classes, thresholds for PER demand are defined as well as for PER generation. The demand includes all energy applications in a building i.e. the heating and cooling energy, as well as hot water, the complete electricity demand, and any auxiliary electricity to provide the energy services. The higher the achieved level of overall efficiency and of renewable energy generation, the higher the Passive House class according to the thresholds as listed in Table 1. This makes the Passive House an ideal blueprint for the NZEB standard.
The following articles are foundation articles which describe the underlying theory, methodology and application of the Primary Energy Renewable system. These articles include the basic knowledge required to understand the PER system and the additional Passive House classes; Passive House Plus and Passive House Premium.
In this section are articles on advanced Primary Energy Renewable topics. These articles go into significant detail on related PER topics and do require an understanding of the basics and foundations of the PER system.
Renewable energy is the ideal complement to the energy efficiency of the Passive House Standard. In order to provide reliable guidance for this combination, the Passive House Institute has introduced new categories for its building certification; in addition to the established “Passive House Classic”, there are (starting with the publication of PHPP 9) the Passive House Plus and Passive House Premium classes. A new evaluation procedure, focusing on Primary Energy Renewable (PER), serves as the basis for the extension of Passive House Certification.
iPHA Fact Sheets related to PER and Passive House Classes:
Feist, Wolfgang: Energy concepts – the Passive House in comparison. In: Conference Proceedings of the 17th International Passive House Conference, Frankfurt/Darmstadt 2013.
Feist, Wolfgang: Passive House – the next decade. In: Conference Proceedings of the 18th International Passive House Conference, Aachen/Darmstadt 2014.
Grove-Smith, Jessica and Feist, Wolfgang. The PER assessment method… Conference Proceedings: 19th International Passive House Conference. Innsbruck/Darmstadt, 2015
Grove-Smith, Jessica; Wolfgang Feist; Benjamin Krick: Balancing energy efficiency and renewable energies: An assessment concept for nearly zero-energy buildings. In: Bertoldi, P. JRC of European Commission (ed.): 9th International Conference Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings and Smart Communities, 2016. p. 894-902. Link to external article here
[Feist 2013] Feist, W.: Energy concepts – the Passive House in comparison. In: Conference Proceedings of the 17th International Passive House Conference, Frankfurt, April 2013.