basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house [2015/04/14 14:33] – bwuensch | basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house [2015/04/14 14:33] – bwuensch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
[{{: | [{{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
What did we learn? Conservation is much less expensive than solar. For every dollar we spent on reducing heat loss from the house, with a better air barrier and more insulation, we saved at least 10 dollars on the size of solar collectors and equipment needed to achieve the same thing. Now let us look at some of the details of the house. | What did we learn? Conservation is much less expensive than solar. For every dollar we spent on reducing heat loss from the house, with a better air barrier and more insulation, we saved at least 10 dollars on the size of solar collectors and equipment needed to achieve the same thing. Now let us look at some of the details of the house. |
basics/the_passive_house_-_historical_review/poineer_award/saskatchewan_conservation_house.txt · Last modified: 2015/04/14 14:44 by bwuensch