User Tools

Site Tools


basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house [2015/04/14 14:33]
bwuensch
basics:the_passive_house_-_historical_review:poineer_award:saskatchewan_conservation_house [2015/04/14 14:44]
bwuensch
Line 66: Line 66:
  
 [{{:​picopen:​saskatchewan_house_drawing.jpg?​500|}}] [{{:​picopen:​saskatchewan_house_drawing.jpg?​500|}}]
 +
 +----
    
 What did we learn? Conservation is much less expensive than solar. For every dollar we spent on reducing heat loss from the house, with a better air barrier and more insulation, we saved at least 10 dollars on the size of solar collectors and equipment needed to achieve the same thing. Now let us look at some of the details of the house. What did we learn? Conservation is much less expensive than solar. For every dollar we spent on reducing heat loss from the house, with a better air barrier and more insulation, we saved at least 10 dollars on the size of solar collectors and equipment needed to achieve the same thing. Now let us look at some of the details of the house.
basics/the_passive_house_-_historical_review/poineer_award/saskatchewan_conservation_house.txt · Last modified: 2015/04/14 14:44 by bwuensch